I may change how printnpost works....what do you think?
- By O2SMedia .com
- Published 05/1/2009
O2SMedia .com
Ok...I created this site to help anyone intrested to make money online. It is amazing how easy it is to make some extra cash online if you are up for the legwork!...I have checks to prove it and a google adsense deposit monthly. So welcome and feel free to ask me anything..also check out my new blog site for tips and thing i fidn online. www.O2SMedia.com.
If you like My Post, buy me a beer. (Suggested: $3 a beer or $7.5 for a pitcher)
I am considering changing how the site works. I may offer a upfront per article payout and a affiliate program for recruiting authors. I believe this may result in a better overall payout to authors.
Many authors dont seem to understand the full concept of adsense but are willing to make money online. So to provide the mass with a better payout I have been pondering on this for some time.
Spread The Word
7 Responses to "I may change how printnpost works....what do you think?" 
|
said this on 19 May 2009 12:38:36 AM EST
Instead of coming up with a new way for the site to work... it would be great if the site would just WORK. Posting things faster would definately get you more content... and as you used to say, "content is king."
I admit that I have stopped looking at the site as much as I used to because it doesn't change every day, or even every week, the way it used to. When I tried to get on yesterday, the site was completely down again. When I got on today, the newest blog post was over 10 days old. When I have sent in blogs recently (not as often as I used to), it takes so long for them to get posted that they are bumped off the front page because they are so old. I was logging on to post today, but when I saw how long it's been since there has been any turnover I thought, "why bother?" I have become more interested in some of my other projects that have more immediate results. To cut down on the lag time, perhaps you could have a trial period of 3 months or so to monitor an author and then allow them to post without being reviewed and/or count on the community to flag a prohibited posting for you to remove. It would be nice for some of us who have been around for a while to be trusted to post our own blogs and articles immediately. The headlined "recent articles" are anything but recent. If they are so popular, wouldn't they do just as well under the popular articles heading? I'd be more likely to check out articles if those were rotated a little more frequently. When writing a blog, momentum can build. If you want people to be posting 2 - 3 times a week again, then something needs to change. I do thank you for the opportunity to create a blog and learn from submitting articles. I hope that you decide to get back on the pony. |
|
said this on 02 May 2009 12:53:32 PM EST
This sounds good, but it won't mean a thing without consistent updating! The product we writers are selling here has lost its value lately, because updates are so long in coming.
I haven't been contributing lately, because every time I submit, I wait and wait for posting, then end up emailing you, asking you to post my submissions. Then, I wait some more. Eventually, some of them get posted. I am still waiting for one article to get posted, even though in my request I gave you the specific URL to the article. Since it was an Easter article, its "window of timeliness" has disappeared. I've missed out on potential hits on articles that have been mentioned in the media, because the weren't posted until long after the media attention moved elsewhere. I tend to focus on articles rather than blogging, but since blogs are primarily daily, the bloggers here must be completely fed up. How can they keep their blogs fresh if it takes so long to get each post on line? I and some other writers on the site have noticed that page hits have dropped off sharply. Is it any wonder? Look at the splash page: * "Recent News" has just been updated, but for months it was stagnant. The Linkbee article included links for weeks that either led to a "not found" or an "under construction" notice. * "Featured Articles" was the same for several months before the last update. As I type, the first article is "Surprise Romantic Gifts for Valentine's Day," which tells you about when the most "recent" update was made. I envy those who got featured, as their articles have been in a prime spot since February. That would be great, IF the rest of the site were changing daily! * Check the submission dates on any blog piece or article. They are at best 2-3 days old, often more than 7. In short, PrintNPost.com is a stagnant publication in an extremely dynamic medium. In such a fast-paced, up-to-the-minute arena, why would anyone bother to visit this site every day? How can we recruit other writers to the site when we can't get our own stuff posted in a timely fashion? The site rules tell us we should submit a minimum of 3 times a week. What's the point of doing that when it takes more than a week to get our submissions published? These are basic issues that, if addressed, would make the site more valuable to both readers and writers. It's a very basic business principle: take care of the basics, then expand to new ways of attracting customers. If the product you're attracting them to isn't good, they won't stay around. It's a simple as that. Once the basics are covered, then yes, go for the upfront payment. Maybe more of us will get on Twitter to increase hits, too. But hit increases will not last long without fresh material. We do our best to provide that fresh material, but we depend on you to get that material on line quickly and consistently. |
|
said this on 03 May 2009 5:21:59 PM EST
This sounds like a great idea, David.
|
|
said this on 10 May 2009 6:19:53 PM EST
I'd like the option for affiliate links of my own in the body of the article.
|
|
said this on 21 May 2009 11:34:38 AM EST
I agree with Hunter Homesteader...let's starting taking care of the basics before you venture out with additional features. The site was down for almost a week with no explanation, I have an article that's still pending approval after 10 days, etc. It's difficult to keep excited about this site's potential when the basics are not being adequately addressed.
|
|
said this on 22 May 2009 10:16:01 PM EST
Hi David,
I told you a few months ago that your site is a diamond in the rough. In order for this website to shine, you're going to have to let it go. You're going to have to let your faithful bloggers; those you've come to learn their style and temperature of writing that you can trust; write without administrative editing. It's impossible to edit every person's writings. Most writings are non-controversial; and, primarily just easy reading on the run. Writers would be better served if you would bypass the adsense thing and require readers to pay a dollar, if they're interested in reading past the tease line (5 lines at the beginning). Each author should be allowed to put a "Pay Now" button on their writings. Serious readers will be willing to pay the $1. a day to have access to reading works of their favorite blogger. At the end of the month a check should be issued to authors based on the number of transactions received for their writings. For example: Jane Doe publishes an article on PNP. A reader sees her article's title and reads the intro (first paragraph). If interested, past the introduction, he'll see a button that says "Pay Now to read the entire article." The reader agrees to pay and is allowed to read the post. Let's say the reader sees 6 articles by six different authors, and decides to read each in full. Or maybe Jane Doe has published six articles in one day and he wants to read each of those. He's spent six bucks. I'm not sure; but that's about the cup most people pay for a cup of coffee at Starbucks. At the end of the day, some people will do what they can to get around paying; but, people with integrity will pay and help "struggling writers" get their gigs off the ground. I write because I love writing. Getting $1. per hit would be like a tip in a basket you might find at the feet of a musician on the street. Good Luck, David. I know your heart is in the right place; but, you may have to lose the middle man in the long run. We're writers primarily and quite honestly the Adsense thing doesn't add up for the hours most people spend writing. Your cut would be 20% of every $1. This means each writer would make $0.80 per payout. Pay Pal would be the only acceptable means of transferring money and the donate button would originate from them. Please see mytusense.blogspot.com to see the donate button on my page. And again, Good Luck and Godspeed! |
|
said this on 05 Jul 2009 8:53:38 AM EST
I think that the big challenge to keep printnpost working is first, and primarily, to remove the administrative barrier to keep product fresh and moving. Automate the front page updates to articles as you did with the top authors, instead of worrying about reading each article and monitoring them, let them flow. Let the community police itself, with a link that allows people to flag articles as being outside the realm of acceptability. Then you can sit back and work on the more important things, instead of being a proofreader/administrator . Most of the big forums on the internet start out with a "wild west" feel, the more freedom people are allowed and the fresher the content, the more addicting an experience it is. Plus, you are free to PROMOTE-PROMOTE-PROMOTE! Which is obviously what you do best. Look at how far you have brought this place! Take yourself out as the middle man David. Unleash the bloggers and authors on this site to create massive amounts of content! With this, provide a guideline for what is acceptable and not, and stick to it. You will see big changes!
|

Author/Admin)